Neuro. Prod. > Accessories > Amplifiers > Chron. Rec. Dev. > Data Acquis. Sys. > Eye Track. Sys. > Microdrives > Microelectrodes > Microinject. Sys.> Optogenet. Prod. > Prim. Train. Sys. > Screws > Software > Stereotaxic Instr. > Cell&Tissue Med. > Rodent Products Medical Products Electrochemical Products

Premium Tetrodes

4 platinum/tungsten cores, quartz insulated for other Microdrives

Neuroscience Products > Accessories > Amplifiers > Chronic Recording Devices > Data Acquisition Systems > Eye Tracking Systems > Microdrives > Microelectrodes > Microinjection Systems> Optogenetic Products > Primate Training Systems > Screws > Software > Stereotaxic Instruments > Cell & Tissue Media > Rodent Products Medical Products Electrochemical Products

Premium Tetrodes

4 platinum/tungsten cores, quartz insulated for other Microdrives

The Thomas multicore microelectrodes were designed by Heribert Reitboeck and Uwe Thomas in 1987 in the Reitboeck lab at the University of Marburg, Germany.

The Thomas tetrode is superior to a single microelectrode due to single unit isolation out of a multi-unit recording. For details concerning the working principle of a Thomas tetrode please see chapter “Tetrode Principle”.  

The Thomas tetrode is made of quartz glass insulated platinum tungsten wires.

Key features:
  • Material:Quartzglass insulated Platinum/Tungsten
  • 4 metal cores
  • Fiber diameter of 100µm
  • Unique material combination
  • Biocompatible materials
  • Well suited for acute and also for long term chronic recordings
  • very close electrode spacings are possible (down to 80µm) when using Thomas microdrives
  • very thin shafts minimize tissue damage
  • Suitable for cortical as well as deep brain recordings
Technical Data
Core conductor material:platinum (95%), tungsten (5%)
Insulation material:quartz glass
Tip shape:(A) Pulled & ground, Impedance 1 – 2 MΩ
(B) Only ground, Impedance 0.5 – 0.8 MΩ
Connectors:Gold plated Amphenol sockets (female, 4021EFL)
Gold plated Amphenol pin (male, 535EFL)
Samtec socket (4060EFL)
without connector (open end)
Other connectors on request!

Mating connectors available from Thomas RECORDING

CharacteristicTip Shape ATip Shape D
Tip treatmentpulled & groundground
Impedance1MΩ – 2MΩ500kΩ – 800kΩ
Well suited forbrain areas with higher cell densities (e.g. rat cerebellum)brain areas with “normal” cell density (e.g. monkey cortex)

Figure 2: Tip shapes of Thomas tetrodes. Tip shape A is a double conical tip shape well suited for single unit isolation in brain areas with higher cell densities (e.g. rat cerebellum).

General Information

The recording radius and spatial selectivity of an extracellular probe are important for interpreting neurophysiological recordings but are rarely measured. Moreover, an analysis of the recording biophysics of multisite probes (e.g., tetrodes) can provide for source characterization and localization of spiking single units, but this capability has remained largely unexploited.

The Thomas tetrode working principle was evaluated in the Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience (BCCN) research project „Memory Network“ (see poster presentation: Memory Networks – Thomas Tetrode Evaluation; Klaus Obermayer, Matthias Munk, Uwe Thomas, Dirk Hoehl, Poster Presentation, Bernstein Center Evaluation Meeting, Berlin, 2007).

Thomas tetrodes are the only tetrodes presently available that can be adapted to different cell densities in different species or brain areas. The Thomas tetrodes are available for Thomas Microdrive systems (see figure 3).


[69] Dugué G. P., Tuh M., Gourévitch B., Léna C. Cerebellar re-encoding of self-generated head movements. 2017; eLife; DOI: 10.7554/eLife.26179

[68] Nguyen, M., Schanze, T. (2017): Approaches to inversely estimate a neuronal source’s position with multichannel microelectrodes. Poster presentation at the 12th Goettingen Meeting of the German Neuroscience Society, March 2017

[67] Lee C. W., King C. E., Wu S. C., Swindlehurst A. L., Nenadic Z. Signal Source Localization with Tetrodes: Experimental Verification. 33rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS, 2011

[66] Mechler F., Victor J. D. Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials. J Comput Neurosci, June 2011

[65] Victor J. D., Mechler F., Ohiorhenuan I., Schmid A. M., Purpura K. P. Laminar and Orientation-Dependent Characteristics of Spatial Nonlinearities: Implications for the Computational Architecture of Visual Cortex. J Neurophysiol, October 2009, 102:3414-3432

[64] Schmid A. M., Purpura K. P., Ohiorhenuan I., Mechler F., Victor J. D. Subpopulations of neurons in visual area V2 perform differentiation and integration operations in space and time. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, November 2009, Volume 3 Article 15

[63] Pasalar S., Roitman A. V., Durfee W. K., Ebner T. J. Force field effects on cerebellar Purkinje cell discharge with implications for internal models. Nature Neuroscience, November 2006, Volume 9 Number 11

[62] Soteropoulos D. S., Baker S. N. Bilateral representation in the deep cerebellar nuclei. J Physiol, 2008, 586.4 pp 1117-1136

[61] Soteropoulos D. S., Baker S. N. Callosum and Cerebellum to Motor Coordination in Monkey J Neurophysiol, August 2007

[60] Schmidt E. M. Electrodes for Many Single Neuron Recording

[59] Williams E. R., Soteropoulos D. S., Baker S. N. Spinal interneuron circuits reduce approximately 10-Hz movement discontinuities by phase cancellation PNAS, June 2010, vol. 107 no. 24

[58] Mechler F., Victor J. D., Ohiorhenuan I., Schmid A. M., Hu Q. Three-dimensional localization of neurons in cortical tetrode recordings J Neurophysiol, May 2011, 106:828-848

[57] Gao H., de Solages C. , Lena C. Tetrode recordings in the cerebellar cortex J. Physiol, 2011

[56] Smith M. A., Kohn A. Spatial and temporal scales of neuronal correlation in primary visual cortex J Neurosci, November 2008, 28(48): 12591-12603

[55] Park Y., Park H., Lee C. J., Choi S., Jo S., Choi H., Kim Y., Shin H., Llinas R.R., Kim D. CaV3.1 is a tremor rhythm pacemaker in the inferior olive PNAS, June 2010, vol. 107 no. 23 10731-10736

[54] Mechler F., Reich D.S., Victor J.D. Detection and Discrimination of Relative Spatial Phase by V1 Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience 2002, 22:6129-6157

[53] Aronov V., Reich D.S., Melcher F., Victor J. Neural coding of spatial phase in V1 of macaque monkey Journal of Neurophysiology 89: 3304-3327, 2003

[52] Emondi A.A., Rebrik S.P., Kurgansky A.V., Miller K.D. Tracking neurons recorded from tetrodes across time Journal of Neuroscience Methods 135 (2004) 95-105

[51] Kühn A.A., Trottenberg T., Kivi A., Kupsch A., Schneider G.-H., Brown P. The relationship between local field potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease Experimental Neurology 194 (2005) 212-220

[50] Hirabayashi T., Miyashita Y. Dynamically Modulated Spike Correlation in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex Depending on the Feature Configuration within a Whole Object Journal of Neuroscience 2005, 25:10299-10307

[49] Soteropoulos D.S., Baker S.N. Cortico-Cerebellar Coherence During a Precision Grip Task in the Monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology 95: 1194-1206, 2006

[48] Victor J.D., Mechler F., Repucci M.A., Purpura K.P., Sharpee T. Responses of V1 Neurons to Two-Dimensional Hermite Functions Journal of Neurophysiology 95: 379-400, 2006

[47] Adams D.L., Horton J.C. Monocular Cells Without Ocular Dominance Columns Journal of Neurophysiology 96: 2253-2264, 2006

[46] de Solages C., Szapiro G., Brunel N., Hakim V., Isope P., Buisseret P., Rousseau Ch., Barbour B. and Léna C. High-Frequency Organization and Synchrony of Activity in the Purkinje Cell Layer of the Cerebellum. Neuron, 58, 775-788, 2008

[45] Mechler, F., Victor, J. D., Ohiorhenuan, I. E., Schmid, A., and Quin, H. Three-dimensional localization of neurons in cortical tetrode recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology 106[2], 828-848. 2011Tetrode User Publications

[44] Mechler, F. and Victor, J. D. Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials. J Comput Neurosci Published online: June 11, 2011[DOI 10.1007/s10827-011-0341-0]. 11-6-2011

[42] Kaneko H, Tamura H, Kawashima T, Suzuki SS, Fujita I. Efficient Signal Processing of Multineuronal Activities for Neural Interface and Prosthesis. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46: 147-150.

[41] Kaneko H, Tamura H, Suzuki SS. Tracking spike-amplitude changes to improve the quality of multineuronal data analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2007; 54: 262-272.

[40] Emondi AA. Technical Report for Thomas Recording. 2000.

[39] Reich DS. Information Encoding by Individual Neurons and Groups of Neurons in the Primary Visual Cortex. New York: Rockefeller University; 2000.

[38] Bierer SM, Phillips JO, Fuchs AF, Kaneko ChRS, Ling L, Nie K et al. Neurophysiological Studies of Electrical Stimulation for the Vestibular Nerve. USA: NIH; 2007.

[37] Hargreaves EL, Smith A.C., Brown E.N., Suzuki W.A. Tetrode recordings of learning related neural activity in the primate entorhinal cortex during a location-scene task. Society for Neuroscience 2006. 2006.

[36] Soteropoulos DS, Baker SN. Cortico-Cerebellar Coherence During a Precision Grip Task in the Monkey. J Neurophysiol 2006; 95: 1194-1206.

[35] Hirabayashi T, Miyashita Y. Dynamically Modulated Spike Correlation in Monkey Inferior Temporal Cortex Depending on the Feature Configuration within a Whole Object. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 10299-10307.

[34] Capelle HH, Hutchinson WD, Fromm C, Krauss JK. Mikroelektrodenableitung in der funktionellen Neurochirurgie. In: Krauss JK, Volkmann J (eds).Tiefe Hirnstimulation. Darmstadt: Steinkopff Verlag; 2004. pp. 125-168.

[33] Hoehl D, Thomas U. TREC SCANNER – Ein neues System zur funktionellen Neuronavigation bei der Therapie neurodegenerativer Erkrankungen. Blackwell Verlag; 2003. p. 13.

[32] Trottenberg T, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P, Kühn AA. Frequency-dependent distribution of local field potential activity within the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology 2007; 205: 287-291.

[31] Trottenberg T, Fogelson N, Kühn AA, Kivi A, Kupsch A, Schneider GH et al. Subthalamic gamma activity in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology 2006; 200: 56-65.

[30] Kühn AA, Trottenberg T, Kivi A, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P. The relationship between localfield potential and neuronal discharge in the subthalamic nucleus of patients with Parkinson’s disease. Experimental Neurology 2005; 194: 212-220.

[29] Chen ChCh, Kühn AA, Trottenberg T, Kupsch A, Schneider GH, Brown P. Neuronal activity in globus pallidus interna can be synchronized to local field potential activity over 3-12 Hz in patients with dystonia. Experimental Neurology 2006; 202: 480-486.

[28] Engel AK, Moll CK, Fried I, Ojemann GA. Invasive recordings from the human brain: clinical insights and beyond. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6: 35-47.

[27] Lozano A, Hutchinson W, Kiss Z, Tasker R, Davis K, Dostrovsky J. Methods for microelectrode-guided posteroventral pallidotomy. J Neurosurgery 1996; 84: 194-202.

[26] Hutchinson W, Lozano A, Davis K, Saint-Cyr JA, Lang AE, Dostrovsky J. Differential neuronal activity in segments of globus pallidus in Parkinson’s disease patients. neuroreport 1994; 5: 1533-1537.

[25] Emondi AA, Rebrik SP, Kurgansky AV, Miller KD. Tracking neurons recorded from tetrodes across time. J Neurosci Methods 2004; 135: 95-105.

[24] Logothetis NK, Kayser Ch, Oeltermann A. In Vivo Measurement of Cortical Impedance Spectrum in Monkeys: Implications for Signal Propagation. Neuron 2007; 55: 809-823.

[23] Henze DA, Borhegyi Z, Csicsvari J, Mamiya A, Harris KD, Buzsaki G. Intracellular Features Predicted by Extracellular Recordings in the Hippocampus In Vivo. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 390-400

[22] Wilms M, Eckhorn R. Spatiotemporal receptive field properties of epiretinally recorded spikes and local electroretinograms in cats. BMC Neuroscience 2005; 6: 1-14.

[21] Baker SN, Philbin N, Spinks RL, Wolpert DM, MacManus DG, Pauluis Q et al. Multiple single unit recording in the cortex of monkeys using independently moveable microelectrodes. J Neurosci Methods 1999; 94: 5-17.

[20] Eckhorn R, Thomas U. A new method for the insertion of multiple microprobes into neural and muscular tissue, including fiber electrodes, fine wires, needles and microsensors. J Neurosci Methods 1993; 49: 175-179.

[19] Hoehl D. Mechanical evaluation of quartz lass insulated fiber electrodes. unpublished report; 2003.

[18] McNaughton B, Barnes CA, O´Keefe J. The stereotrode: a new technique for simultaneous isolation of several single units in the central nervous system from multiple unit records. J Neurosci Methods 1983; 8: 391-397.

[17] Menne KML. Feature extraction from realistically simulated and recorded multisite neuronal signals. Medical University Luebeck, Germany; 2002.

[16] Vollgraf R, Munk M, Obermayer K. Optimal filtering for spike sorting of multi-site electrode recordings. Network 2005; 16: 85-113.

[15] Rebrik SP, Tzonev S, Miller KD. Analysis of Tetrode Recordings in Cat Visual System. CNS. 2007.

[14] Buzsaki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 446-451.

[13] Gray CM, Maldonado PE, Wilson M, McNaughton B. Tetrodes markedly improve the reliability and yield of multiple single-unit isolation from multi-unit recordings in cat striate cortex. J Neurosci Methods 1995; 63: 43-54.

[12] Harris KD, Henze DA, Csicsvari J, Hirase H, Buzsaki G. Accuracy of Tetrode Spike Separation as Determined by Simultaneous Intracellular and Extracellular Measurements. J Neurophysiol 2000; 84: 401-414.

[11] Reitboeck HJ. A 19 channel matrix drive with individually controllable fiber microelectrodes for neurophysiological applications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1983; 13: 676-683.

[10] Mountcastle VB, Reitboeck HJ, Poggio GF, Steinmetz MA. Adaptation of the Reitboeck method of multiple microelectrode recording to the neocortex of the waking monkey. J Neurosci Methods 1991; 36: 77-84.

[9] Adams DL, Horton JC. Monocular Cells Without Ocular Dominance Columns. J Neurophysiol 2006; 96: 2253-2264.

[8] Tammer R, Ehrenreich L, Boretius S, Watanabe T, Frahm J, Michaelis T. Compatibility of glass-guided recording microelectrodes in the brain stem of squirrel monkeys with high-resolution 3D MRI. J Neurosci Methods 2006; 153: 221-229.

[7] Swadlow HA, Bereshpolova Y, Bezdudnaya T, Cano M, Stoelzel CR. A multi-channel, implantable microdrive system for use with sharp, ultra-fine „Reitboeck“ microelectrodes. J Neurophysiol 2005; 93: 2959-2965.

[6] Eckhorn R, Thomas U. Fasermikroelektroden für technische und medizinische Anwendungen. Hannover Messe. 1987.

[5] Reitboeck HJ. Fiber microelectrodes for electrophysiological recordings. J Neurosci Methods 1983; 8: 249-262.

[4] Schmidt EM. Electrodes for many single neuron recordings. In: Nicolelis MAL (ed).Methods for Neural Ensemble Recordings. New York: CRC Press LLC; 1999. pp. 1-23.

[3] Tamura H, Kaneko H, Kawasaki K., Fujita I. Presumed Inhibitory Neurons in the Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex: Visual Response Properties and Functional Interactions with Adjacent Neurons. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 2782-2796.

[2] Tamura H, Kaneko H, Fujita I. Quantitative analysis of functional clustering of neurons in the macaque inferior temporal cortex. Neuroscience Research 2005; 52: 311-322.

[1] Kaneko H, Suzuki SS, Okada J, Akamatsu M. Classifying neuronal spikes from multiunit recording by using a multisite electrode. 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE. 1996. pp. 1500-1501.

Working Principle

Detailed Information

Figure 1: Thomas Tetrode tip. The Thomas tetrode consists of a unique fiber (OD=100µm) with 4 individual metal cores inside and a quartz glass insulation surrounding the metal wires. The metal is an alloy of 95% platinum and just 5% tungsten. The tetrode tip is highly reproducible by using unique manufacturing techniques. The smooth tip shapes reduces tissue damage to a minimum, in comparison to twisted wire or silicon tetrodes.

Figure 3: Thomas tetrode for other electrode microdrive systems. In this case the fiber is strengthened with a metal or glass tube instead of the Thomas rubber tube drive unit. The metal or glass tube strengthens the thin tetrode fiber. As already mentioned the tetrode is available with two different tip shapes according to the adaptation to different species and different brain areas with different cell (see tetrode data sheet for details).

After Reitboeck [5] and Eckhorn [6], the Thomas microelectrode and tetrode manufacturing technique has some advantages in comparison to other tetrode or microelectrode techniques presently used for neurophysiology. These advantages are the following (for details see [5]):

1. The shaft of the fiber electrodes, over the whole penetration depth, is cylindrical and very thin (see REM photo below). Tetrodes with 90 – 100µm and microelectrodes with outer diameters of 20 – 80 µm and also down to the nanometer scale have been made in the last 20 years. Due to their small dimensions these fiber electrodes only cause minimal tissue damage. (see for example [7], [8]). Horton and Adams reported [9]:”…Because tetrodes leave no visible tissue tracks and cortex becomes distorted in the flatmounting process, only data from recording sites in the immediate vicinity of a lesion could be reliably assigned to layer 4C…“.

2. The mechanical stability of the fibers is very high, perhaps close to the limit of what is possible at these dimensions with any material at this time. Fibers with 100µm outer diameter at an axial force of 6p (which is more than required for dura penetration) have a buckling length of 10mm. In tissue the penetration depth of these fiber electrodes can be more than 20mm. Tests in explanted pig brains showed, that the fiber microelectrodes moved straight in the brain over distances of app. 40mm without leaving the planned trajectory (see picture below).

Figure 5: Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photo of a Thomas tetrode fiber with conical tip (tip shape D). This picture shows that we are able to produce tetrodes with thin shaft diameters for different applications.

Figure 6: These pictures show a penetration test with Thomas fiber microelectrodes. The electrodes moves straight through the brain over a distance of 40.000µm although the fibers just had 80µm outer diameter. The drawn connecting lines in the rigth photo show that the exit points of the elelctrodes are exactly at the opposite side of the entrance points.

3. Due to the geometrical shape of the fibers, tissue is displaced radially during penetration, while little axial tissue compression. There is little or no re-adjustment of tissue after insertion, which might be one of the reasons why injury potentials are hardly ever seen after electrode movement has stopped

4. The geometrical shape of the electrode tip can be made exactly and reproducibly according to the specifications, as long as it is a tip geometry that is grindable. Conical tips can be reproduced with high accuracy

Figure 7: Thomas tetrode tip with conical tip shape. This tip is highly reproducible in contrast to twisted wire tetrode tips.

5. Additional electrolytic plating of the platinum-tungsten tips is unproblematic. We have fabricated fiber electrodes with gold-, iron-, and silver-silver/chloride plated tips. Iron plated tips can be used for electrolytic staining of recording sites. The silver-silver/chloride sites have excellent low frequency responses and DC stability.

6. Microgrooves, caused by the grinding process, increase the effective tip area at a given tip volume. This results in a tip capacitance of more than 2pF/µm2. Which is considerably higher than the tip capacitance of etched tips. The high tip capacitance seems to be responsible for the excellent signal-to-noise ratio and single unit isolation of the electrodes. (for details see [10], [11]). Fiber electrodes are well-suited for multielectrode arrays. In contrast to silicon-substrate electrodes movement control of individual electrodes is possible as reported for example by Mountcastle and others [10].

Figure 8: Tip contact (left SEM photo) and side contact (right SEM photo) of a Thomas tetrode. One can see the microgrooves in the metal and the smooth passage between the insulating glass and the metal core conductor.

Figure 9: Example of a Thomas tetrode recording in rat cortex showing the good S/N ratio of the tetrode. Channel 2 (tip of the tetrode) has the largest spike amplitudes. The detected neuron was located close to the tetrode tip (Recording made by L. Melo-Thomas, D. Hoehl, 2014).

7. In contrast to other tetrodes presently available for neurophysiological research Thomas tetrodes can be adapted to the neural cell densities in different species and brain areas. Therefore we offer two different tip shapes (Tip A and D). Higher cell densities require smaller contact distances and also slightly higher contact tissue impedances. This is realized by pulling and grinding a tetrode fiber to yield the tetrodes with tip shape A. 

Tetrode Working Priciple

The tetrode technique relies on the fact that action potential amplitude is some declining function of distance between the electrode tip and the cell. Therefore, if cellular activity is recorded from 4 closely spaced electrode contacts the relative amplitudes of the spikes on the 4 channels can be used as an additional criterion for spike separation. Moreover, if the spikes from a given cell changes shape and/or amplitude, as occurs during burst firing [12], these changes are proportionally the same on the 4 channels, thus allowing accurate identification of these cells. Not only does the method reduce errors in classification, but it also increases the number of cells that can be identified [13].

The Thomas tetrode working principle is illustrated in Figure 13. In this photomontage a tetrode tip is placed close to two neurons. Neuron A is placed closer to the recording tetrode tip as neuron B. The signals shown in Figure 13 (right side) were recorded with the tetrode based intraoperative neuronavigation system TREC SCANNER (Thomas RECORDING GmbH) in a clinical recording experiment.

Figure 12: Left side: Illustration of the Thomas tetrode working principle. Right side: Signals recorded with a Thomas tetrode in the human brainstem.

Figure 13: Extracellular recording with a Thomas tetrode in subthalamic nucleus of an anesthetized dystonia patient, University Hospital Heidelberg, D. Hoehl (TREC) in 2002. One can discern up to three different units out of the multi unit tetrode recording (unit A, B and C) based on the stereotrode effect.

Separation of spikes from different neurons is based on the assumption that spike amplitude decreases with the distance between the neuron (A in Figure 13) and the tip of the tetrode. The different lengths of the white arrows in Figure 13 demonstrate the different distances between the neuron (A) which is the signal source and the recording contacts of the tetrode. This effect causes different spike amplitudes on the four different channels of the tetrode. An example tetrode recording is shown in Figure 13 (right side). This is an amplitude pattern characteristic for neuron A. Neuron B which is located in a larger distance from the tetrode recording contacts causes generally smaller amplitudes in the recorded signal. Notice the difference in the signals of neuron A and B. Thus, the ratio of spike amplitudes measured on different contacts provides reliable information for spike discrimination. The tetrode, which is made of four very thin wires insulated from each other by quartz glass is the minimal set of electrodes that provides „triangulation“ in the three-dimensional space (see [14] for details).

If tetrode tips are not located in a plane, like it is the case with the Thomas tetrode, and under the idealization that neurons are point sources in a homogenous medium, the ratios of spike amplitudes will be unique for each neuron. In contrast to the tetrode, a single electrode is „spatially blind“, and its use for multi-neuron recordings can easily lead to mixing of signals from different cells whose spike amplitudes as measured at the electrode site are equal. The multi-unit nature of tetrode recordings imposes additional requirements on spike-sorting procedures. While in traditional extracellular recordings an experimentalist can position the electrode to enhance the signal from the neuron of interest, tetrodes are best positioned to record from as many cells as possible. This means that spike sorting can no longer be based on simple thresholding or on window discrimination (often implemented in hardware) – sorting of tetrode data is essentially software-based [15-17].

Finally we can conclude that the tetrode working principle is based on the following rules:

  1. Signal amplitude is a function of the neuron-recording site distance

  2. The ratios of the amplitudes of a single neuron’s action potential, as recorded on the different tetrode contacts, are much more likely to be constant from spike to spike than the amplitudes themselves

Figure 14: This picture shows a tetrode recording on the left side and just one channel of the tetrode recording representing a single electrode recording on the right side. Both elelctrodes detect a bursting neuron. The tetrode is able to identify the bursting neuron due to the fact that the amplitude changes of the action potential happen on all four channels simultaneously. The single channel of the elelctrode detects the amplitude changes of the action potential as well but the template matching spike sorter will show fail detections due to the amplitude changes. So in case of the elelctrode several single units will be detected, while the tetrode and the tetrode spike sorter will identify just a single bursting neuron.

The recording radius and spatial selectivity of an extracellular probe are important for interpreting neurophysiological recordings but are rarely measured. Moreover, an analysis of the recording biophysics of multisite probes (e.g., tetrodes) can provide for source characterization and localization of spiking single units, but this capability has remained largely unexploited. The research group of Prof. Dr. Jonathan Victor at Cornell University in New York  has addressed both issues by using Thomas tetrodes quantitatively in the following  publications (Mechler, F. and Victor, J. D. Dipole characterization of single neurons from their extracellular action potentials. J Comput Neurosci Published online: June 11, 2011[DOI 10.1007/s10827-011-0341-0]. 11-6-2011, and Mechler, F., Victor, J. D., Ohiorhenuan, I. E., Schmid, A., and Quin, H. Three-dimensional localization of neurons in cortical tetrode recordings. Journal of Neurophysiology 106[2], 828-848. 2011).

Advantages of the Thomas tetrode technique

The main differences between Thomas tetrodes and other tetrode designs presently used in neurophysiology are:

Reproducible tip geometry: based on the fact that Thomas tetrodes are made by a unique quartz glass metal fiber manufacturing process [5] the intersite spacing of the tetrode fiber is always constant for hundreds of meters of tetrode fiber raw material. This ensures a very high reproducibility of geometrical dimensions and positions of the four individual metal wires inside a TREC tetrode (see Figure 16). In contrast to this unique design other tetrodes are based for example on a twisted wire technology described for example by McNaughton [18] and Gray [13]. There the Thomas tetrodes have the advantage of a reproducible wire arrangement and intersite spacing which is required for reproducible experiment conditions (see Figure 8).

Figure 16: Cross section of a Thomas RECORDING quartz glass platinum tungsten tetrode. In the left picture one can see a light microscope photo of the cross section, the right drawing shows the dimensions of this fiber sample cross section.

Electrode impedance: The surface of a twisted wire tetrode metal contact is relatively small and usually shows impedance values of more than 1MΩ, which is too high for multi unit recordings. To lower the impedance value of this surface the metal contacts of the tetrode have to be plated with for example platinum black. This thin layer of platinum on the bare metal wire contact surface is mechanically not very stable and can be removed by shear forces, when the tetrode is introduced in brain tissue. TREC tetrodes have microgrooves in the surface of the metal contacts, caused by the special tip grinding process during the tetrode manufacture. These microgrooves increase the effective metal surface area of the tetrode contacts which causes a significant higher capacitive component of the electrode impedance  (2.2pF/µm2) than the 0.5-1pF/µm2 typically measured for example on electrochemical etched microelectrode tips see ([5] for details). The tetrode contact impedance of just ground tetrode tips usually is below 1MΩ on each of the four contacts. This manufacturing technique ensures a low and reproducible impedance, well suited for multi unit recordings without the requirement of plating the metal contact surface. This technique avoids the problem of removing a thin platinum black layer on the metal wire contact surface during insertion of the tetrode tip into brain tissue by shear forces.

Neural network adaptation: Another advantage of the TREC tetrode design is that it can be adapted to different neural cell densities in different brain areas. This is explained by the following pictures in Figure 17 (A, B and C) (note that black traces are recordings and red traces are difference pairs). In Figure 17A a standard tetrode with just ground tip (site impedance of app. 500kΩ) was used for recordings in monkey cortex. The recordings on each tetrode channel are multi unit recordings. An isolation of single units from this multi unit recording by the tetrode effect was easily possible. Later the same tetrode was used for recordings in rat cerebellum. The result of this recording session was a relatively poor signal to noise ratio and a bad tetrode effect as shown in Figure 6B. It was very difficult to isolate single units from this data set. After a small modification of the tetrode tip (pulling the tip before grinding) the tetrode design was well suited for recording applications in brain areas with higher cell densities. Figure 17C shows the recording results with the modified tetrode tip in rat cerebellum. The modification of the tip causes two main changes in the tetrode design: a) the spacing between the four metal wires and b) the diameter of each wire were reduced. The smaller diameter of the metal wires causes a smaller exposed metal contact surface with a larger tip contact impedance (app. 1.2MΩ) and a smaller recording sphere for each contact. The result of the decreased intersite spacing was, that smaller signal amplitude differences of the closely spaced neurons could be better detected as before. For the first time it was possible to adapt a tetrode to the neural cell density and furthermore this adaptation was reproducible by using Thomas tetrodes. As far as we know, this kind of adaptation was not described for twisted wire tetrodes.

Figure 17A: Recording in monkey cortex made with a TREC tetrode. This picture shows a multi unit recording on each of the four recording channels. The tetrode tip was just ground causing a conical tip shape and  impedance values of app. 500k? at f=1kHz (sinewave) on each contact.

Figure 17B: Recording in rat cerebellum made a TREC tetrode. In this case the same tetrode was used as for the recording shown in figure A. The higher neural cell density in rat cerebellum causes pickup of more units at a time in contrast to the recordings in monkey cortex. This makes it much more difficult to isolate single units from the multi unit recording.

Figure 17C: Recording in rat cerebellum made with a modified TREC tetrode. In this case a modified tetrode was used. The tetrode tip was pulled and ground to get a double conical tip shape with a decreased intersite spacing and a small increase in contact impedance (1.2M? at f=1kHz (sinewave) on each contact. The modified tetrode tip made the tetrode more selective according to the higher neural cell density in rat cerebellum.

Reproducibility of the tip design: The high reproducible industrial manufacturing process of Thomas tetrodes makes it possible to provide tetrodes with a very high and constant quality and reproducible specifications to a large number of scientists. This ensures that recording results are comparable and reproducible according to the basic scientific rule: If results are not reproducible, don´t believe them. The tip geometry is reproducible due to a special designed tip grinding machine that allows tip grinding at always the same adjustable angle (see [5] for details).

Figure 18: Tip shape of the Thomas tetrodes is reproducible due to special designed manufacturing equipment like for example tip grinding machines with xyz manipulators for precise tip angle adjustment during the grinding process

Mechanical biocompatibility: The very smooth passage between the metal wire and the quartz glass insulation does not cause much tissue damage when the Thomas tetrode is introduced in brain tissue. Twisted wire tetrodes cause more tissue damage due to the special tip geometry of four twisted and cut wires. Silicon probes like the University of Michigan probes have sharp cutting edges and work like a knife when introduced into brain tissue. The reduction of the mechanical influence on the recording environment is important for a good recording microelectrode.  A comparison between the tip geometry of a twisted wire stereotrode and a Thomas tetrode tip is presented in Figure 19. It is obvious, that the tip of the Thomas tetrode shows smooth passages between the metal contacts and the glass insulation. After using Thomas tetrodes for recordings in squirrel monkey cortex Adams et al. [9] reported concerning the tissue damage of Thomas tetrodes: “…Because tetrodes leave no visible tissue tracks and cortex becomes distorted in the flatmounting process, only data from recording sites in the immediate vicinity of a lesion could be reliably assigned to layer 4C. The tetrode enabled us often to isolate numerous cells at a single recording site…” (for details see [9]).

Figure 19: Comparison between a twisted wire stereotrode tip (A) and a Thomas tetrode tip (B). (A modified from [18])

Spatial resolution: TREC tetrode tips have a special arrangement of the four wires with one centre core at the very end of the tip and three contacts concentric arranged around the centre core some micrometers away from the tip contact Figure 21. With this special contact arrangement TREC tetrodes provide a better spatial resolution in comparison to twisted wire electrode contacts that are all arranged in one plane at the very end of the tetrode tip (see Figure 21). Multisite silicon probes have all contacts on one side of the shaft and therefore only one preferred recording direction.

Signal quality: One basic requirement for a reliable tetrode spike sorting is an optimal signal to noise ratio (SNR) of the recorded signal. Whilst the noise is almost identical and low across the four Thomas tetrode contacts, the spikes are clearly different like shown in Figure 20 (A, B, C and D). 

Figure 20A: Clinical tetrode recordings made in the basal ganglia of an anesthetised dystonia patient. The left pictures show some recording samples at different positions along the tetrode trajectory through the GP  (Recordings made by D. Hoehl, TREC, 2001 in Heidelberg)

Figure 20B: The shown tetrode signals have a very good signal-to- noise ratio especially for that recording contact that is located very close to the signal source (trace #2 from top in the left picture). The other three traces show lower voltage amplitudes according to the larger distance between the recording sites and the signal source.

Figure 20C: This picture shows an area where no activity could be detected (quiet zone).

Figure 20D: This figure shows some recordings made with a Thomas tetrode in a human brain (Hoehl, TREC, 2002).

Deep brain recording applications: Thomas tetrodes can be placed with high precision to reach deep brain structures without stabilizing them with metal tubes. It was demonstrated by Hoehl [19] that Thomas fiber electrodes travel straight in the brain over distances up to 40mm (see Figure 6). Twisted wire tetrodes are very flexible and therefore have to be strengthened for deep brain recording applications. Hypodermic tubing has been used to strengthen wire bundle arrays for placement in deep structures. This causes much more tissue damage on the trajectory down to the recording target as with Thomas fiber tetrodes. Deep brain recordings with multisite silicon probes are also problematic because of the limited length of the forklike probes. 

Figure 21: TREC fiber electrodes travel straight in the brain. Three electrodes were driven laterally into an explanted pig brain with a constant interelectrode spacing. All three electrodes left the brain on the opposite side in the same arrangement. The drawn connecting lines show the electrode trajectory in the brain. (Test and photo made by Dirk Hoehl, Thomas RECORDING GmbH, 2003)

Chronic recording applications: It was reported by Swadlow et al. [7], that Thomas fiber electrodes retain their excellent recording characteristics and can remain under microdrive control for periods of many months and, in one remarkable case for more than four years. The reason for this good behaviour may be, that the electrodes do not cause much tissue damage when they are introduced into the brain and therefore do not induce an excessive proliferation of neuroglia (gliosis) around the trajectory. Therefore the TREC fiber electrodes are well suited also for chronic recordings. Based on the fact, that Thomas tetrodes are made from the same raw material and manufactured with the same machines and techniques we can assume that Thomas tetrodes show a similar biocompatibility in chronic recording applications.

Questions? Please don’t hesitate contacting us!

Data Privacy

* Required field







Sign Up

Contact       Imprint       Data Privacy       Solutions       About Us       YouTube       Twitter

Menü schließen